Proxmox & KVM: The Rise of Open-Source Virtualization

Over the last 18 months, it’s been very evident that open-source virtualization is becoming very popular. Tools such as VirtualBox, and the native VM capabilities of Linux have made it very easy to consume Virtualization.

One such trend is the rise of open-source virtualization, with platforms like Proxmox VE and KVM gaining traction as viable alternatives to established proprietary solutions like VMware vSphere.

This article looks into the factors driving this shift, analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of open-source virtualization and its potential to disrupt the market.

Market Share and Adoption Trends

Industry reports and market analysis indicate a growing presence of open-source virtualization solutions in the IT landscape. Proxmox VE, a prominent open-source platform, holds a market share of about 0.9% in the virtualization platform category, boasting over 3,000 customers across ten countries ¹. This platform is particularly popular among small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) with 50-200 employees and $1M-$10M in revenue, primarily in the United States and within the Information Technology and Services industry ². KVM, another key player in the open-source virtualization space, exhibits a similar market share of approximately 0.1% ³.

Further evidence of the growing popularity of open-source virtualization can be found in analyst reports and industry trends. Reports indicate a significant increase in the adoption of open-source hyper-converged infrastructure (HCI) solutions, with the software segment, in particular, benefiting from the collaborative contributions of the open-source community ⁴. This suggests that enterprises are increasingly recognizing the value and potential of open-source virtualization for their IT needs.

Strengths of Open-Source Virtualization

Open-source virtualization solutions offer several compelling advantages that contribute to their growing popularity:

• Cost-effectiveness: A primary benefit is the cost savings associated with open-source solutions. Proxmox VE, for example, is licensed under the GNU Affero General Public License version 3, meaning there are no licensing fees for the software itself ⁵. This can significantly reduce the initial setup costs and ongoing expenses compared to proprietary options like VMware vSphere, which require licensing fees for various components and features ⁶. This makes Proxmox VE a particularly attractive option for SMBs seeking to reduce IT expenses while maintaining a competitive edge ⁷.
• Flexibility and Customization: Open-source platforms provide greater flexibility and customization options compared to their proprietary counterparts. With access to the source code, organizations can tailor the software to their specific needs and integrate it with other open-source tools and technologies ⁸. This level of control can be particularly appealing to organizations with in-house Linux expertise or those seeking a highly customizable virtualization environment.
• Community Support and Collaboration: Open-source virtualization solutions benefit from a vibrant and active community of developers and users. This fosters collaboration, knowledge sharing, and rapid innovation, leading to continuous improvements and a wealth of resources available through forums, mailing lists, and online documentation ⁹. This collaborative ecosystem can be a valuable asset for organizations seeking support and guidance in their virtualization journey.
• Security and Reliability: While concerns about the security of open-source software have historically existed, the open-source development model, with its emphasis on transparency and peer review, can actually enhance security. The open nature of the code allows for greater scrutiny and faster identification and resolution of vulnerabilities ¹⁰. Moreover, open-source solutions like Proxmox VE often leverage established and well-tested Linux technologies, contributing to their reliability and stability ¹¹.

Weaknesses of Open-Source Virtualization

While open-source virtualization offers numerous advantages, it’s essential to consider some potential limitations as well:

• Complexity and Technical Expertise: While platforms like Proxmox VE offer user-friendly interfaces, effectively managing and configuring open-source virtualization solutions often requires a deeper understanding of Linux and virtualization technologies ¹². This can pose a challenge for organizations with limited in-house Linux expertise or those seeking a more streamlined and user-friendly experience. Additionally, some users find the Proxmox VE interface less intuitive compared to other platforms, potentially requiring more manual effort for certain tasks ¹³.
• Limited Vendor Support: Unlike proprietary solutions with dedicated vendor support channels and service-level agreements, open-source virtualization typically relies on community support ¹⁴. While community support can be very effective, it may not always meet the needs of organizations requiring guaranteed response times or dedicated support from experienced professionals. However, some companies offer commercial support for open-source virtualization deployments, providing an alternative for those seeking professional assistance.
• Potential for Compatibility Issues: While open-source solutions generally support a wide range of hardware and operating systems, there may be instances where compatibility issues arise, particularly with specialized hardware or less common operating systems ¹⁵. This can require additional configuration or troubleshooting, potentially increasing the complexity of deployment and management.
• Overhead Compared to Containers: For users who primarily need containerization rather than full virtual machines, running applications directly in Docker containers on a minimal OS can be more resource-efficient and easier to manage than using Proxmox VE ¹³.

Proxmox VE: A Closer Look

Proxmox VE is a powerful and versatile open-source virtualization platform that combines the benefits of full virtualization with KVM and containerization with LXC. It offers a comprehensive set of features, including:

• Web-based Management: Proxmox VE provides an intuitive web interface for managing virtual machines, containers, storage, networking, and other aspects of the virtualized environment ¹⁶. This simplifies administration and allows for centralized management of the entire virtualization infrastructure.
• High Availability and Clustering: Proxmox VE supports high-availability clusters, ensuring that virtual machines and containers remain operational even if a physical server fails ¹⁷. This is crucial for organizations requiring high uptime and business continuity for their critical applications.
• Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity: The high availability and backup features of Proxmox VE make it ideal for disaster recovery and business continuity planning ¹⁶.
• Flexible Storage Options: Proxmox VE offers a wide range of storage options, including local storage, network file systems (NFS), iSCSI, and Ceph ¹⁸. This allows organizations to choose the most suitable storage solution for their needs and optimize their storage infrastructure for performance and cost-effectiveness.
• Software-Defined Networking: Proxmox VE supports software-defined networking (SDN), enabling flexible configuration and management of virtual networks ¹⁷. This can simplify network management and improve network performance in dynamic and scalable environments.

KVM: The Foundation of Open-Source Virtualization

KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine) is a core component of many open-source virtualization solutions, including Proxmox VE. It is a type-1 hypervisor integrated into the Linux kernel, providing a lightweight and efficient virtualization solution. KVM leverages hardware virtualization extensions, such as Intel VT-x or AMD-V, to deliver near-native performance for virtual machines ¹⁹.

KVM’s strengths include:

• Performance and Efficiency: KVM’s close integration with the Linux kernel and hardware virtualization extensions results in excellent performance and efficient resource utilization ¹⁹. This makes it well-suited for demanding workloads and resource-intensive applications.
• Security and Isolation: KVM provides strong isolation between virtual machines, ensuring that security breaches or issues in one VM do not affect others ¹⁹. This is crucial for maintaining the security and stability of the virtualization environment.
• Wide Operating System Support: KVM supports a wide range of guest operating systems, including various Linux distributions, Windows, and other operating systems ¹⁹. This flexibility allows organizations to virtualize diverse workloads and applications on a single platform.
• Energy Efficiency: KVM switches can contribute to energy efficiency by reducing hardware redundancy, lowering the overall electrical load, and decreasing power consumption ²⁰.
• Security Considerations: While KVM itself is a secure virtualization technology, it’s important to be aware of potential vulnerabilities in commercial KVM switches. These switches may lack adequate security mechanisms, potentially leading to data leakage or malicious code attacks through shared peripherals ²¹. Secure KVM implementations with proper isolation and protection measures are crucial for maintaining a secure environment.
• Clustering Limitations: Compared to VMware vSphere, KVM’s clustering features may have some limitations ²². vSphere offers more advanced clustering capabilities and a wider range of features for managing large-scale deployments.

Comparing Open-Source and Proprietary Virtualization

When comparing open-source virtualization solutions like Proxmox VE and KVM to proprietary options like VMware vSphere, several key differences emerge:

Feature	Proxmox VE/KVM	VMware vSphere
Licensing	Open-source, no licensing fees	Proprietary, licensing fees required
Cost	Generally lower initial and ongoing costs	Higher upfront and subscription costs
Flexibility	Highly customizable, access to source code	Limited customization options
Support	Excellent performance can outperform vSphere in certain scenarios 23	Dedicated vendor support
Performance	Excellent performance, can outperform vSphere in certain scenarios 23	Excellent performance, optimized for Windows environments
Features	Comprehensive feature set, including HA and SDN	Extensive feature set, including advanced management tools
Ease of Use	User-friendly web interface, but may require Linux expertise	Polished interface, but potentially steeper learning curve
Network Setup	Can be cumbersome, requiring manual configuration 24	More advanced network configuration options
Physical Memory Size	Maximum of 12 TB per host 24	Maximum of 24 TB per host 24
Hosts per Cluster	Maximum of 32 hosts 24	Maximum of 96 hosts 24
VMs per Host Server	No limit 24	Maximum of 1024 VMs 24
Virtual Disk Size	No limit 24	Maximum of 62 TB 24
Boot Speed	Standard boot process	Boosted boot speed with memory suspension 24

The choice between open-source and proprietary virtualization ultimately depends on the specific needs and priorities of the organization. Open-source solutions offer cost-effectiveness, flexibility, and community support, while proprietary options provide dedicated vendor support, advanced features, and a potentially more polished user experience.

Disrupting the Market: The Potential of Open Source

Open-source virtualization has the potential to disrupt the virtualization market in several ways:

• Increased Competition: The availability of viable open-source alternatives puts pressure on proprietary vendors to innovate and offer more competitive pricing. This can benefit organizations by providing more choices and driving down the overall cost of virtualization solutions.
• Accelerated Innovation: The open-source development model fosters collaboration and rapid innovation, leading to faster development cycles and the introduction of new features and capabilities. This can accelerate the pace of technological advancement in the virtualization space.
• Shifting Control: Open-source solutions empower organizations with greater control over their IT infrastructure ⁸. This can reduce vendor lock-in ²⁵ and provide greater flexibility in adapting to changing business needs and technological advancements.
• Integration with Emerging Technologies: The rise of containerization and Kubernetes is transforming the virtualization landscape. Open-source virtualization solutions are well-positioned to integrate with and support these technologies, offering a flexible and cost-effective foundation for modern cloud-native applications ²⁶.

Future Roadmap and Development Plans

Both Proxmox VE and KVM have active development roadmaps with plans for future enhancements and new features:

Proxmox VE:

• Proxmox VE 8.2: This release focuses on improved migration automation, enhanced firewall capabilities, and LXC device passthrough functionality ²⁷.
• Software-Defined Networking: Proxmox VE is actively developing and stabilizing its Software-Defined Network stack, with plans for DHCP-based IP address management and improved user interface experience ²⁸.
• Proxmox Datacenter Manager: This new project aims to provide a centralized overview and management platform for multiple Proxmox VE nodes and clusters, simplifying administration and resource management ²⁹.

KVM:

• Continued Integration with Cloud Environments: KVM is expected to play an increasingly important role in modern cloud environments, with ongoing integration into cloud services and platforms ³⁰.
• Advancements in Security and Performance: The open-source community continues to drive KVM development, focusing on enhancing security features, improving performance, and expanding support for new hardware and technologies ³¹.

These roadmaps demonstrate the ongoing commitment to innovation and improvement within the open-source virtualization community, ensuring that these solutions remain competitive and relevant in the evolving IT landscape.

Case Studies and Success Stories

Several organizations have successfully implemented open-source virtualization solutions, demonstrating their viability and potential:

• Textkernel: A leading AI-powered technology provider in the HR industry, Textkernel utilizes Proxmox VE and its high-availability features to expand its infrastructure across multiple data center locations ³².
• EdgeUno: A provider of connectivity and cloud services in Latin America, EdgeUno leverages Proxmox VE to achieve scalability and reliability across 25 global locations ³².
• Adobe Advertising Cloud: One of the largest OpenStack deployments in the world, Adobe Advertising Cloud operates on an OpenStack private cloud with over 100,000 compute cores, managed by just four engineers ³³. This demonstrates the scalability and efficiency of open-source virtualization in demanding environments.

Conclusion

The rise of open-source virtualization is a significant trend with the potential to reshape the enterprise IT landscape. Solutions like Proxmox VE and KVM offer compelling advantages, including cost-effectiveness, flexibility, and community support, making them particularly attractive to SMBs and organizations seeking to reduce vendor lock-in. While challenges remain in terms of complexity and vendor support, open-source virtualization has proven its ability to deliver robust performance, security, and scalability in demanding environments.

The open-source development model creates a collaborative ecosystem that drives continuous improvement and rapid innovation, ensuring that these solutions remain competitive and adapt to emerging technologies like cloud computing and containerization. As organizations increasingly seek greater control, agility, and cost-efficiency in their IT infrastructure, open-source virtualization is poised to play an even more prominent role in the future of enterprise computing.

Want to learn more about VMware? Check out our deep dive.

Works Cited

1. Xen vs Proxmox: Which is Better? – ServerMania, accessed on January 2, 2025, https://www.servermania.com/kb/articles/xen-vs-proxmox

2. Companies using Proxmox VE and its marketshare – Enlyft, accessed on January 2, 2025, https://enlyft.com/tech/products/proxmox-ve

3. Companies using KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine) and its marketshare – Enlyft, accessed on January 2, 2025, https://enlyft.com/tech/products/kvm-kernel-based-virtual-machine

4. Open Source Hyperconverged Virtualization Infrastructure Market | 2032, accessed on January 2, 2025, https://growthmarketreports.com/report/open-source-hyperconverged-virtualization-infrastructure-market-global-industry-analysis

5. Comparison – Proxmox VE vs vSphere, Hyper-V, Xen, accessed on January 2, 2025, https://www.proxmox.com/en/proxmox-virtual-environment/comparison

6. Proxmox vs. VMware: Comprehensive Comparison, Performance, and Cost Analysis, accessed on January 2, 2025, https://www.diskinternals.com/vmfs-recovery/proxmox-vs-vmware/

7. Proxmox VS VMware: How to Choose the Best Server Virtualization Platform – DNSnetworks, accessed on January 2, 2025, https://dnsnetworks.com/blog/posts/proxmox-vs-vmware-how-to-choose-the-best-server-virtualization-platform

8. VMware vs. KVM: 6 Key Differences and How to Choose – Faddom, accessed on January 2, 2025, https://faddom.com/vmware-vs-kvm/

9. Get support – Proxmox VE, accessed on January 2, 2025, https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Get_support

10. Optimizing Performance and Security in Proxmox VE: Best Practices for System Administrators – DEV Community, accessed on January 2, 2025, https://dev.to/ahmadrahimizadeh/optimizing-performance-and-security-in-proxmox-ve-best-practices-for-system-administrators-2b8h

11. www.proxmox.com, accessed on January 2, 2025, https://www.proxmox.com/en/proxmox-virtual-environment/features#:~:text=The%20Proxmox%20VE%20HA%20Cluster,integrated%20web%2Dbased%20user%20interface.

12. Views on Proxmox (pros/cons) – Development – Whonix Forum, accessed on January 2, 2025, https://forums.whonix.org/t/views-on-proxmox-pros-cons/11448

13. Why Some Users Avoid Proxmox: Exploring the Drawbacks and Alternatives | by Mr.PlanB, accessed on January 2, 2025, https://medium.com/@PlanB./why-some-users-avoid-proxmox-exploring-the-drawbacks-and-alternatives-7306a466b06f

14. VMware vs KVM: A 5-Point Analysis – BDRSuite, accessed on January 2, 2025, https://www.bdrsuite.com/blog/vmware-vs-kvm-a-5-point-analysis/

15. OpenVZ vs. KVM: Which Virtualization Method is Better? – NameHero, accessed on January 2, 2025, https://www.namehero.com/blog/openvz-vs-kvm-which-virtualization-method-is-better/

16. Proxmox VE | Benefits & Applications & Management Essentials | Vinchin Backup, accessed on January 2, 2025, https://www.vinchin.com/vm-tips/proxmox-ve.html

17. What is Proxmox Virtual Environment (VE)? – Unitrends, accessed on January 2, 2025, https://www.unitrends.com/blog/what-is-proxmox-virtual-environment/

18. ESXi vs. Proxmox VE: How to Choose the Right Hypervisor. – 45Drives Blog, accessed on January 2, 2025, http://www.45drives.com/blog/proxmox/esxi-vs-proxmox-ve-how-to-choose-the-right-hypervisor/

19. What is KVM VPS? Pros, Cons & Comparison with Others – Veeble Hosting, accessed on January 2, 2025, https://www.veeble.com/blog/kvm-vps-explained-with-pros-and-cons/

20. Various Applications and Benefits of KVM Switches – AV Access, accessed on January 2, 2025, https://www.avaccess.com/blogs/guides/multiple-uses-of-kvm-switches/

21. Why use a secure KVM? | HighSecLabs, accessed on January 2, 2025, https://highseclabs.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Why-use-a-Secure-KVM-Switch-Executive-Summary-from-HSL.pdf

22. VMware vs KVM Hypervisors – Full Comparison – NAKIVO, accessed on January 2, 2025, https://www.nakivo.com/blog/kvm-vs-vmware-performance-pricing-and-hardware-requirements/

23. [TUTORIAL] – Proxmox VE vs VMware ESXi performance comparison, accessed on January 2, 2025, https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/proxmox-ve-vs-vmware-esxi-performance-comparison.119386/

24. Proxmox vs. VMware: A Quick Comparison – HackerNoon, accessed on January 2, 2025, https://hackernoon.com/proxmox-vs-vmware-a-quick-comparison

25. Open source is the disruption that enterprises need. First of two-part series from SUSE, accessed on January 2, 2025, https://erp.today/open-source-is-the-disruption-that-enterprises-need/

26. Has Virtualization Peaked, or Is a New Era About to Begin? – The Futurum Group, accessed on January 2, 2025, https://futurumgroup.com/insights/as-virtualization-landscape-shifts-is-a-new-era-about-to-begin/

27. Roadmap – Proxmox VE, accessed on January 2, 2025, https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Roadmap

28. Proxmox HCI Virtualization Roadmap – Sara Infoway, accessed on January 2, 2025, https://sarainfoway.in/hyperconverged/roadmap-proxmox/

29. Proxmox Datacenter Manager Roadmap, accessed on January 2, 2025, https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Proxmox_Datacenter_Manager_Roadmap

30. Understanding KVM’s role in modern cloud environments – Platform9, accessed on January 2, 2025, https://platform9.com/blog/understanding-kvms-role-in-modern-cloud-environments/

31. KVM vs. VMware – Red Hat, accessed on January 2, 2025, https://www.redhat.com/en/topics/virtualization/kvm-vs-vmware-comparison

32. Success Stories from Proxmox customers & users, accessed on January 2, 2025, https://www.proxmox.com/en/about/stories?f=7

33. Use Cases – Applications of the Technology – OpenStack, accessed on January 2, 2025, https://www.openstack.org/use-cases/